<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The Ninth Justice: Judicial Confirmation Network Vs. White House</title>
        <link>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/05/judicial-confirmation-network.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:43:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Judicial Confirmation Network Vs. White House</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The Judicial Confirmation Network pushed back today after White House press secretary <strong>Robert Gibbs</strong> and Sen. <strong>Charles Schumer</strong>, D-N.Y., downplayed Supreme Court nominee <strong>Sonia Sotomayor</strong>'s comments in 2005 at Duke University about appellate judges making policy from the bench. Gibbs said critics were taking Sotomayor's words "out of context."</p>

<p>At Duke, Sotomayor said: "Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know, and I know this is on tape and I should never say that, because we don't make law, I know.... I'm not promoting it, and I'm not advocating it.... Having said that, the Court of Appeals is where, before the Supreme Court makes the final decision, the law is percolating."</p>

<p><a href="http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/05/judicial-confirmation-network.php">Read more</a> about this over at NationalJournal.com's Under The Influence blog.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/05/judicial-confirmation-network.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/05/judicial-confirmation-network.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
   
