<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The Ninth Justice: Schumer, Gibbs Push For Quick Confirmation</title>
        <link>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/schumer-pushes.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>Schumer, Gibbs Push For Quick Confirmation</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Updated at 9 a.m. on June 30</em></p>

<p>Sen. <strong>Charles Schumer</strong>, D-N.Y., and White House press secretary <strong>Robert Gibbs</strong> both said today that <strong>Sonia Sotomayor</strong>'s confirmation to the Supreme Court has only become more urgent because of an announcement made today by the high court -- and it's not the <em>Ricci</em> case. </p>

<p>In a rare move, the court decided to schedule a re-argument of <a href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission"><em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</em></a> -- which examines whether a movie critical of then-presidential candidate <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong> violated campaign finance laws -- for Sept. 9, during the court's summer recess, instead of early October, when it begins its next term.</p>

<p>"The urgency of her confirmation has become greater as the result of the Supreme Court's action today," Schumer said in a conference call with reporters, adding that this is "another reason we should confirm Sotomayor quickly, so she can be in place to hear it." </p>

<p>In the White House briefing Monday, Gibbs echoed Schumer's thoughts, referencing the same case. "I think that underscores the importance of ensuring that we get a new Supreme Court nominee there in order to become... an active participant in that case, rather than potentially have something that's a four-to-four decision."</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/schumer-pushes.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://ninthjustice.nationaljournal.com/2009/06/schumer-pushes.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
   